We've reached that time of year when it's darker in the mornings and evenings, leaves are starting to fall off the trees, but yet here in the Washington DC area. . . it's still warm and humid! A few updates on how
My race calendar looks like this:
- October 8: Hartford Half Marathon
- November 5: Indianpolis Monumental Marathon
- Thanksgiving: Turkey Trot 5K
- January 15: Houston Marathon
There are 10 weeks in between Indianapolis and Houston, which is a very quick turnaround, but I wanted to do it for a number of reasons. I've always wanted to run the Houston marathon (I've done the half twice) and I also want a season to focus on the half marathon as the target race, so I will be choosing a target half marathon in late March.
New Training Approach
While I've been using McMillan coaches for 8 years, this is my first marathon cycle working directly with Greg McMillan himself. Up to this point, my weekly mileage has been in the low 50s and the marathon is just 8 weeks out. This week I will climb into the upper 50s, but that is still low for me.
But optimizing training is all about experimenting. I've typically done well with very high mileage (in the high 70s) but there have been a few occasions when that has burned me out. And given that I have TWO marathons I'm training for, why not experiment with the first one with some lower mileage?
The thing is. . . mileage is just one piece of the massive training puzzle. Other pieces include the types of workouts, the frequency of workouts, fueling/hydration, stress levels and more. I think it's easy to get hung up on weekly mileage because it's a tangible, measurable thing. And as someone who loves analytics, mileage is definitely something I can get too focused on.
That said, the key to an effective coaching relationship is the communication. It's important for him to receive my feedback on how the runs felt so he can tweak the plan as needed. I am also experienced enough to tweak the plan myself in terms of moving days around.
After years and years of running 70+ miles per week during marathon training, I think I have established a solid endurance base. Endurance has always been my strength, so the ability to work on speed without having super tired legs is worthwhile.
The past 5 weeks of training have been all about TRUST. I have trusted that I am in better shape than my paces suggest due to the heat and humidity. I have trusted that the lower mileage could really work for me. I have trusted that runs that feel bad are a product of tired legs and/or the weather.
A few key workouts
I'll recap a few of my workouts here so you can get a sense of what training has been like.
17.6. miles, 8:52 pace on September 3. It was warm and humid so I kept it really easy. Although when I got back home, I started to see black spots and my vision was slowly getting more and more black. I lied down on the kitchen floor and felt horrible for a few minutes but then I was fine. While everyone struggles in the humidity, I have found that I am susceptible to heat exhaustion and it's not entirely safe for me to be running this kind of distance in the heat. But I did it and survived. Hydration was a major focus for the rest of the day.
9 x 1000m Cruise Intervals with 200m recovery jogs on September 5. Nine might seem like an awkward number, but Coach Greg prescribed 8-10 so I thought 9 would be a happy medium. I was encouraged by this workout. I was extremely consistent with my paces in the 6:44-6:50 range and everything felt controlled. Given the humidity and short recovery jogs I was surprised I could run at that pace for so long.
Marathon Pace workout: 10 miles at 7:37 pace on September 10. Greg's company sponsored a local 10-mile race which meant that many of his co-workers were running it. We both signed up for this last spring and my intention was never to race it full out. Due to the humidity, I adjusted my goal pace from my actual target of 7:15-7:25 to 7:20-7:30. This was not smart. I KNOW that I need to adjust more like 30 seconds per mile in the humidity, not just 5! This meant that I ran the first half of the race too quickly and by mile 6 I felt like I was running half marathon pace just to maintain it. And then it felt like a 10K, followed by a final mile up a 120 foot hill that was a death march. So I ended up averaging 7:37, which is probably what I should have targeted initially, and it would have felt much better at the end.
20 miles, 8:27 pace on September 16. I did my long run on a Friday this week. I have a 10-mile marathon pace workout on Tuesday and looking ahead, Tuesday's weather is the hottest of the week! So I decided to move that marathon pace workout to Monday, but I wanted two full recovery days post 20-miler. So today is a rest day and tomorrow will be an easy day.
This 20-miler did wonders for my confidence. It was cooler and less humid and running a pace of 8:00 towards the end of the run felt like 8:30 a few weeks prior. It's amazing how much weather matters! My average heart rate for this run was 154, and it was also 154 for the 17.6 miler. But this run was further and faster by 25 seconds per mile! So that kind of tells me that maybe 25 seconds per mile is what I need to use in terms of adjusting for the humidity.
|New Balance SuperComp Trainer|
Road Runner Sports gave me a pair of the New Balance SuperComp Trainer in exchange for a review of it on my Instagram. I didn't ask them for this shoe and I had never heard of it. But once I learned about it and wore it on a few runs, it quickly became my new favorite shoe.
I don't like wearing carbon fiber plated shoes in training because I like to save that magic for race day. And this shoe does have a carbon fiber plate. But it's meant to be a training shoe due to its weight. It does feel heavy in the hands but light on the feet. And even though it has an 8mm drop, it's more friendly to my Achilles than the ASICS Nimbus, which has a 13mm drop. This is not at all what I would have expected, but I guess it has to do with how the shoe fits me overall and how it changes my stride. I've worn it for two long runs, including the 20-miler, and it performed like a champ.
And as for "saving the magic" of carbon fiber plate for race day - I feel like I am at a disadvantage with the heat and humidity so the carbon fiber plate levels the playing field!
As for the ASICS Gel Nimbus, I think I have fallen out of love with that shoe as quickly as I fell in love with it. I really loved the Nimbus Lite for long runs, but when they came out with Version 3, it was too big for my feet. By the time I realized this, it was too late to exchange the shoe for a smaller size. (The downfalls of letting shoes sit in your closet for too long). The regular Nimbus 24 initially felt great but the more I ran in it, the more I realized it was too big as well. I kept stopping during runs to make the laces tighter. Additionally, the arch support in the Nimbus 24 is way too noticeable.
It's possible that the previous versions (Nimbus 23 and Nimbus Lite 2) were simply superior shoes and maybe the upcoming versions will be better. But as for now, I am not nearly the Nimbus fan I once was.
My current rotation is the New Balance SuperComp Trainer for long runs, the Adidas Adios Pro 2 for races, the Brooks Ghost 14 and ASICS Nimbus 24 for easy runs, and the Adidas Adios 4 for speed work.
Even though I'm not running right now, I still love hearing about it so I'll be following along and cheering through your race season!ReplyDelete
I didn't write about this on my blog, but last spring I went on a mission of trying out different shoes and for a brief moment I thought that the Nimbus Lite was going to be the Holy Grail. They were so light and so cushiony...and no matter what size I tried they rubbed into my toes so I had to ditch them. The Nimbus "Not Lite" felt clunky and the sizing was smaller than the Lite. C'mon Asics, get it together!
Yes, the Nimbus Lite had so much potential. And if you see Wendy's comment below, she used to love the shoe but then switched.Delete
OK your still Zebra and running like Zebra. Sometimes you over-analyze, but if Greg McMillan going to personally coach you, then simply do and report the results and see what Coach says. When you have a Coach, ultimately it is best to simply do what they prescribe in training, report the results, advise on any issues could be injuries or other, and leave the decision-making to the Coach. Then you focus simply on doing the training. I like that approach and appears you going to go with it. Your in an elite mix when Greg MacMillan adopts you into his coaching regimen! Take what the day gives you!ReplyDelete
How exciting for you to be training under Greg McMillan! It will be interesting to see how you respond to his guidance. You're really experienced now and you know what works, so hopefully you can have a say in how things go as well.ReplyDelete
I used to LOVE the Asics Gel Nimbus and ran in them for many years, including my PR marathon in 2014. A few years later they made some major changes to the shoe and it didn't work for me any more. I went through a couple different shoes before I tried Brooks and have been happy with their shoes since. I know shoe companies want to improve their shoes but sometimes they improvements don't work for their base runners.
If a shoe is successful, I don't know why they make such major changes every year. I can understand small tweaks here and there but so frequently they change the shoe so it's a completely different shoe.Delete
Funny I use the Brooks Ghost as my training shoe for light run days myself. I have used them for harder runs too but prefer to use them in that capacity. I don't quite have the shoe rotation you have. I basically have two different shoes for training (those and Saucony Guide although I wish it got better mileage bc I used to get great mileage out of Asics GT-2000s until they cheapened a version many many years ago. I may be giving them a try again for the winter) and Vaporfly's for racingReplyDelete